The Southern Cross Stunts Trophy

ZakStunts Folyami ratings

Current

Latest update: ZCT295 (February 2026)

New entries: Victor Narl

Personal best: MiDiaN, Spoonboy, Zapper

Racer Rating Change
1 Argammon 2403 n/a
2 MiDiaN 2271 +18
3 Duplode 2179 -43
4 KyLiE 2072 n/a
5 Victor Narl 2065 +75
6 CTG 2021 -50
7 Alain 2006 +42
8 Spoonboy 1963 +38
9 Zapper 1889 +15
10 Frieshansen 1881 +46
11 Alan Rotoi 1868 -79
12 HerrNove 1850 -21
13 Mark Nailwood 1844 +14
14 Overdrijf 1705 -29
15 dreadnaut 1694 +7
16 Mortimer McMire 1643 n/a
17 Erik Barros 1594 +15
18 Ryoma 1558 n/a
19 dstien 1383 -20
20 Cas 1381 n/a
21 Shoegazing Leo 1312 +7
22 afullo 1292 n/a
23 stanceboyCZ 1154 -17

The “change” values are differences between current and previous ratings for racers who took part (and had an included entry) in the latest race.

Near misses

Racers unranked due to inactivity who have raced (with an included entry) within the last twelve rounds.

Racer Rating Latest
Alecu 1055 C290
HunterBoy344 1164 C288
satanziege 1042 C284

Evolution

See the history graph page to visualise and explore the evolution of the ratings and the current ranking across ZakStunts history.

Historical

Latest update: ZCT295 (March 2026)

Racer Pers. Best At
1 Argammon 2414 C289
2 Ayrton 2352 C100
3 Renato Biker 2309 C180
4 Gutix 2302 C111
5 Duplode 2276 C288
6 MiDiaN 2271 C295
7 CTG 2233 C160
8 FinRok 2221 C229
9 Alan Rotoi 2213 C254
10 Akoss Poo 2170 C169
11 Marco 2104 C218
12 KyLiE 2089 C292
13 Bonzai Joe 2072 C134
14 Victor Narl 2065 C295
15 Alain 2019 C32
16 HerrNove 2015 C292
17 Frieshansen 2000 C285
18 Mark L. Rivers 1994 C88
19 SuperBrian 1972 C124
20 Spoonboy 1963 C295
21 Roy Wiegerinck 1963 C15
22 Mingva 1961 C102
23 Friker 1953 C187
24 Chulk 1951 C61
25 Seeker1982 1944 C230
26 Zak McKracken 1906 C64
27 AbuRaf70 1898 C138
28 Zapper 1889 C295
29 Overdrijf 1878 C221
30 DarkChaser 1872 C69
31 Erik Barros 1872 C269
32 Mark Nailwood 1863 C275
33 dreadnaut 1860 C210
34 Usrin 1833 C255
35 vamologocomisso 1788 C69
36 mislav 1782 C64
37 XDude_NL 1778 C28
38 Mortimer McMire 1752 C288
39 Krys TOFF 1732 C45
40 Stingray86 1716 C229
41 Doelloos 1710 C28
42 Imperas 1701 C198
43 Bismarck 1695 C15
44 DieselJoe 1691 C45
45 Ben Snel 1690 C14
46 Ryoma 1676 C280
47 Pershing II 1636 P1
48 Shorty 1631 C167
49 satanziege 1623 C31
50 ADPunk 1616 C142
51 Fernando Brito 1612 C32
52 Heretic 1604 C250
53 dstien 1596 C125
54 Pitman 1560 C107
55 SergioBaro 1559 C53
56 Johnny-K 1555 C54
57 dosbox92 1545 C218
58 JoSi 1514 C110
59 afullo 1508 C243
60 Paleke 1503 C51
61 Pavekiller 1502 C89
62 Cas 1494 C265
63 arturbmallman 1486 C200
64 Shoegazing Leo 1472 C171
65 GTAMan15 1437 C261
66 Guga 1427 C36
67 Eddie Brother 1419 P3
68 Juank_23 1415 C15
69 KHR 1405 C5
70 Crazy Jimmy 1399 C118
71 Ranger 1395 C33
72 PedroAntonio 1394 C64
73 JTK 1389 C26
74 Cyberman 1383 C93
75 Antti 1378 C91
76 Straycat 1372 C233
77 hek 1372 C64
78 Dinmor 1362 C49
79 AMG 1362 C82
80 Trx 1362 C7
81 lise 1349 C48
82 sd4000 1325 C214
83 Igor 1308 C238
84 Böbszlee 1308 C91
85 Neil McRae 1294 C27
86 Fredmen67 1249 C109
87 Motig 1247 C199
88 Stein Viterbo 1247 C279
89 Marci 1227 C64
90 Daffy Duck 1227 C27
91 matamo 1207 C244
92 stanceboyCZ 1193 C292
93 Tweety Bird 1185 C27
94 Daniel3D 1174 C249
95 ZdnBurns 1171 C275
96 Stan 286XT 1167 C238
97 HunterBoy344 1164 C288
98 Lene 1164 C69
99 Alecu 1108 C279

About the ratings

The ratings in this page are calculated using the Folyami system, an Elo-like system adapted for racing competitions and, in particular, ZakStunts. The technical details on the system works and how it differs from Elo are outlined in The Folyami Rating System page. In the following paragraphs, I will focus on the aspects specific to its current implementation for ZakStunts.

Two rankings are assembled from the ratings: current and historical. The current ranking lists the rating for each racer after the most recent race they took part in, while the historical ranking lists the personal best rating reached by each racer over the entire history of the competition. The rankings have complementary purposes: while the current ranking is very dynamic and responsive to form, the historical rating provides lasting records and milestones.

To be included in either ranking, a racer must have completed at least five ZakStunts races, so that their rating can stabilise to some extent after starting from the arbitrary initial value of 1500. Additionally, in accordance with the dynamic, responsive to form nature of the current ranking, racers must race at least once every four races to remain in it. Racers who leave the current ranking due to inactivity can rejoin it at any time by taking part of a race, with their ratings preserved.

While the rating values shown in the rankings are integers, the calculations are done with decimal numbers, with the results only being rounded down for display in the final tables. The order of racers in the rankings is set according to the values before rounding; there are no other tiebreakers. The choice of rounding down, rather than to the nearest integer, was made so that one can look at the rankings and claim that, for instance, someone has reached 2000 points while being sure that the actual result won’t turn out to be, say, 1999.93. The rating differences shown in the tables, as in the “change” column of the current ranking, are taken between the rounded down values for consistency.

The historical data of ZakStunts results used to obtain the ratings was reviewed to eliminate inconsistencies which might muddle up the results. In particular, known ghosts have been excluded altogether from the calculations (legitimate name changes and pseudonyms, on the other hand, have been merged). Additionally, there are three Folyami-specific exclusion rules for race results, which aim at keeping obviously unrepresentative results from affecting the ratings. They are:

Results excluded under those three rules do not count towards reaching the five race threshold for entering the ranking, nor do they count as race activity for the purpose of remaining in the current ranking.

The ZakStunts results data set used to compute the ratings are available in the GitHub repository of the project. If you spot a mistake or an omission in the data, it can be reported through the usual channels, or through an issue or pull request at GitHub.